B2B forestry technology, offline Android app and legacy back office

Technical diagnostic of +DERA for MaderaPlus

Diagnostic staging in place, 203 backend/API calls documented, 32 anonymized business requests, 115 issues/improvements reviewed and 23 prioritized actionable entries.

How it was delivered

Starting point

MaderaPlus needed to understand the real state of +DERA: field Android app, offline synchronization, backend/API, legacy website and release process before investing in evolutives.

Intervention

I rebuilt the technical map, set up local staging, tested the app, backend and web with anonymized data, reviewed the historical issue log and turned the findings into a 30/60/90 roadmap.

Ownership taken

Senior technical diagnostic, staging QA, evolution architecture and backlog prioritization.

Outcome

Diagnostic staging in place, 203 backend/API calls documented, 32 anonymized business requests, 115 issues/improvements reviewed and 23 prioritized actionable entries.

An agency can buy this type of intervention

Executable technical audit, reproducible staging, app/backend/web testing, issue prioritization and roadmap to sell or decide the next phase with less uncertainty.

Evidence and frame

Open public website

Context: B2B forestry technology with field app, web back office, API and offline/online synchronization.
Frame: Direct client with permission to show brand, logo and public website.
Role: Technical diagnostic, staging, QA, prioritization and roadmap.
Visibility: Public case with brand and website; no internal screenshots or private +DERA materials.

Technical base and judgment

Technical base: Android Java, SQLite and offline sync, CakePHP/JSON API, Joomla/PHP legacy, MySQL, Docker Compose, staging fixtures and Kotlin/KMP, Compose, Ktor and React recommendations.
Time frame: Scoped diagnostic with documentation delivery and review session.
Applied judgment: Before selling evolutives on a live legacy product, uncertainty should become evidence: environment, tests, releases and agreed priorities.

Related services

Do you have a delivery with a similar risk?

With the objective, timing, current state and validation owner I can tell you whether there is a real fit and what I would review first.

Send a short brief