01
Priority and capacity
One owner orders the backlog. We agree a working window and the capacity I can reserve.
A development retainer for a changing backlog: improvements, integrations, reviews and QA. Before starting, we agree available capacity, prioritisation, work records and when usage is reviewed.
The public cases show diagnostic work, integration experience and preproduction stabilization.
Review the case and delivered scope+DERA diagnostic: 203 documented backend/API calls and 23 prioritized actions.
SDK and integration work: APIs, examples and documentation designed for partners.
Mobile stabilization: contracts, critical flows, QA and release before production.
Terms are recorded in the proposal; a retainer does not reserve unlimited availability.
01
One owner orders the backlog. We agree a working window and the capacity I can reserve.
02
Work recorded per intervention, estimates before larger tasks and notice when a request changes scope.
03
Review delivered and pending work. Expiry, carryover and urgent work are agreed explicitly.
The minimum worth clarifying before opening a collaboration.
Yes. I can stay behind the agency, work under NDA and adapt to the agency's channels and rules.
Objective, timing, current state, validation owner and the technical piece blocking delivery. With that I can orient the next step.
Yes. That is a common case: review the base, take ownership of a concrete part and leave the exit documented.
It stays inside the agreed agency frame. The delivery is left ready to publish, maintain or transfer to the right team.
If you are still comparing options, these routes help narrow the decision.
With objective, timing, current state and the technical blocker, I can reply with the next step.